Initial Privacy Assessment Forms

2012 IHBG PRA Initial Privacy Assessment.docx

Indian Housing Block Grants (IHBG) Program Reporting

Initial Privacy Assessment Forms

OMB: 2577-0218

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf




U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT




INITIAL PRIVACY ASSESSMENT (IPA)


Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) Program Reporting

Information Collection



Office of Native American Programs



August 27, 2012




INTRODUCTION



What is an Initial Privacy Assessment?

An Initial Privacy Assessment (IPA) is designed to assess whether a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA), a Privacy Act system of records notice (SORN), and/or other related privacy documents are required. The responses to the IPA will provide a foundation for determining if either a PIA or SORN or both will be required, and will also help to identify any policy concerns.


The IPA incorporates the matters previously addressed in the Department’s Personally Identifiable Information (PII) Survey, and thus replaces the survey.


When should an IPA be completed?

An IPA should be completed for all information collection activities, whether the system is electronic or contains only records in paper form, and should be completed before commencement of any testing or pilot project of an information system or prior to implementing new information collections requests. Additionally, an IPA should be completed any time there is a change to the information system or collection to determine whether there are any privacy issues as a result of such a change.


Who should complete the IPA?

The IPA should be written and reviewed by a combination of the component’s (e.g., Privacy Act Officer, System Owner, Project Leaders, Paperwork Reduction Act Compliance Officers), and the program-specific office responsible for the system, project or information collections.


How is the IPA related to the Capital Planning, Certification and Accreditation, and the Paperwork Reduction Act process?

Upon completion and approval of the IPA by the Privacy Officer the official document may be uploaded into the C&A tool, and provided as part of the IT Capital Planning, and Paperwork Reduction Act package as validation of the completed evaluation. The completed IPA demonstrates that the program components have consciously considered privacy and related requirements as part of the overall information activities. For an IT system that does not require a C&A, such as a minor application that runs on a system that does require a C&A, an IPA still should be completed to determine if other related privacy documentation are required for that system or project.


Where should the completed IPA be sent?

A copy of the completed IPA should be sent to the Office of Privacy Project Leads for review. The Privacy Officer will review the IPA and determine what additional privacy documentation is required, and then will advise the Program component accordingly.


Initial Privacy Assessment



INFORMATION ABOUT THE SYSTEM OR PROJECT



Date Submitted for Review: August 27, 2012


Project Name/Acronym: IHBG Program Reporting


System Owner/Contact information:

Rodger Boyd, Deputy Assistant Secretary

Office of Native American Programs

HUD (Room 4126)

451 7th Street

Washington, DC 20410

202-402-3326

rodger.j.boyd@hud.gov



Project Leader/Contact Information:

Jennifer Bullough, Director

Office of Grants Evaluation

Office of Native American Programs

HUD (Room 5156)

451 7th Street

Washington, DC 20410

202-402-4274

jennifer.a.bullough@hud.gov




Which of the following describes the type of records in the system:




Paper-Only


Combination of Paper and Electronic


System


Other: Please describe below the type of project or system, including paper based Privacy Act System of Records, Rules, or Technologies’. Also, indicate whether this is a revision/update for an existing system or project.



Note: For this form purpose, there is no distinction made between technologies/systems managed by contractors. All technologies/systems should be initially reviewed for potential privacy impact.


Section I: The Entire IPA (Sections I and II) Should be Completed for New Systems or Projects. If this is an Existing System or Project Skip to Section II. Unless requested by the Office of Privacy, this section should not be completed for an existing System or Project.


Question 1: Provide a general description of the system of

Project. The following questions are intended to define the scope of the information in the system, information collection, or project, specifically the nature of the information and the sources from which it is obtained.


  1. From whom is the information collected (i.e., government employees, contractors, or consultants, state, local government entities, or general public)?


  1. What is the functionality of the system, information collection, or project and the purpose that the records and/or system serve?


c. How is information transmitted to and from the system, information collection, or project?


d. What are the interconnections with other systems or projects?


QUESTION 2: Have the IPA been reviewed and approved by the Chief Privacy Officer

(If no, please contact component privacy official for official approval)



QUESTION 3: What is the Status of system, information collection, or project


  1. If this is a new system, information collection, or project, specify expected production date.


  1. If an existing system, information collection, or project, specify date of production.


QUESTION 4: Does this system, information collection, or project collect personal identifiers/sensitive information


YES



NO



Does the system, information collection, or project collect personal/sensitive information? (e.g. name, address, personal email address, gender/sex, race/ethnicity, income/financial data, employment history, medical history, Social Security Number, Tax Identification Number, Employee Identification Number, FHA Case Number). Includes PII that may be part of a registration process?


If yes, specific data sets collected or provided, and the legal authorities, arrangement, and/or agreement authorize the collection of information (i.e. must include authorities that cover all information collection activities, including Social Security Numbers)?


QUESTION 5: Does the information about individuals identify particular individuals (i.e., is the information linked or linkable to specific individuals, often referred to as personally identifiable information?)


QUESTION 6: What type of Notice(s) are provided to the individual on the scope of information collected, the opportunity to consent to uses of said information, the opportunity to decline to provide information. (A notice may include a posted privacy policy, a Privacy Act notice on form(s), and/or a system of records notice published in the Federal Register.)


  1. Was any form of notice provided to the individual prior to collection of information? If yes, please provide a copy of the notice as an appendix. (A notice may include a posted privacy policy, a Privacy Act notice on form(s), and/or a system of records notice published in the Federal Register.) If notice was not published, why not?


  1. Do individuals have an opportunity and/or right to decline to provide information?


  1. Do individuals have an opportunity to consent to particular uses of the information, and if so, what is the procedure by which an individual would provide such consent?




QUESTION 7: Is there a Certification & Accreditation record for your system? (This question does not apply to Information Collection Requests)


Specify below the systems categorization. If not available identify the FISMA-reported system whose Certification and Accreditation covers this system.



Confidentiality

Low

Moderate

High

Undefined

Integrity

Low

Moderate

High

Undefined

Availability

Low

Moderate

High

Undefined



SECTION II - The Entire IPA should be completed for New Systems or Projects. If this is an Existing System or Project Complete Only Complete This Section.


QUESTION 1: When was the system, information collection, or project developed?


In, 1998, OMB authorized the collection of information associated with the Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) program. Information is collected from federally recognized Indian tribes and tribally-designated housing entities (TDHE) that receive Indian Housing Block Grant (IHBG) funds, as authorized by the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act (NAHASDA).


HUD does not collect personal data under the IHBG program. The IHBG regulations at 24 CFR Part 1000 authorize HUD to collect only the names of tribal and TDHE officials responsible for applying for, reporting on, and receiving IHBG funds.


Forms submitted by IHBG recipients ensure the identity of the recipient, enhance the accuracy of housing assistance provided by HUD’s funding allocation formula (HUD-4117 - Formula Response Form, and HUD-4119 - Guidelines for Challenging U.S. Decennial Census Data Document), and inform HUD on the planned and actual uses of IHBG funds (HUD-52737 - Indian Housing Plan/Annual Performance Report (IHP/APR)).


IHBG recipients may submit the required forms either on paper or electronically. Paper submissions are sent to HUD by regular mail, facsimile, or as an attachment to an email. Electronic versions of the IHP/APR are submitted on HUD’s Energy and Performance Information Center (EPIC) website.


QUESTION 2: If an existing system, information collection, or project, has the system or project undergone any changes since April 17, 2003?


The IHP/APR revisions pertained to the type of information submitted by IHBG recipients. None of the changes resulted in an increase in personal information collected from IHBG recipients.



QUESTION 3: If an existing system, information collection, or project, has the system or project, explain the changes the system or project will be undergoing as part of this renewal/update process.


The IHP/APR (HUD-52737) is currently available in a Word version. HUD intends to make available a revised Word version, a new Excel version, and a new EPIC version. All three versions of the IHP/APR request the same information and a recipient may elect to submit to HUD either the Word, Excel, or EPIC versions; however, the Excel and EPIC versions are preferred because of their automated capabilities and reduced burden. The Word, Excel, and EPIC versions differ from the current version of HUD-52737 with the elimination of Line 1 (Planned Grant-Based Budget for Eligible Programs) in Section 5 (Budgets) because collection of this information served no valid purpose. The revised versions will be available at the end of December 2012.


QUESTION 4: Do the changes to the system, information collection, or project involve a change in the type of records maintained, the individuals on whom records are maintained, or the use or dissemination of information from the system?


No.


QUESTION 5: Please indicate if any of the following changes to the system or project have occurred: (Mark all boxes that apply.)


A conversion from paper-based records to an electronic system.


A change from information in a format that is anonymous or non-identifiable to a format that is identifiable to particular individuals.


A new use of an IT system, including application of a new technology that changes how information in identifiable form is managed. (For example, a change that would create a more open environment and /or avenue for exposure of data that previously did not exist.)


A change that results in information in identifiable form being merged, centralized, or matched with other databases.


A new method of authenticating the use of an access to information in the identifiable form by members of the public.


A systematic incorporation of databases of information in identifiable form purchased or obtained from commercial or public sources.


A new interagency use of shared agency function that results in new uses or exchanges of information in identifiable form.


A change that results in a new use of disclosure of information in identifiable form.


A change that results in new items of information in identifiable form being added into the system.



QUESTION 6: Does a PIA for the system or project already exist? If yes, please provide a copy of the notice as an appendix.


Yes.

Privacy Office determination


(To be completed by the Privacy Office)




This is NOT a privacy sensitive system, information collection or project – the system, information collection, or project contains no personal identifiers/sensitive information




This IS a Privacy Sensitive Project



IPA sufficient at this time




A PIA is required



The existing PIA requires an update/deletion



A SORN is required



The existing SORN requires an update or should be deleted



Other


COMMENTS:















DOCUMENT ENDORSMENT



DATE REVIEWED:

PRIVACY REVIEWING OFFICIALS NAME:



By Signing below you attest that the content captured in this document is accurate and complete and meet the requirements of applicable federal regulations and HUD internal policies.










SYSTEM OR PROJECT OWNER

Rodger Boyd, Deputy Assistant Secretary



Date

Office of Native American Programs















PROGRAM AREA MANAGER

Jennifer Bullough, Director, Office of Grants Evaluation



Date

Office of Native American Programs














CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICER,

<<INSERT NAME>>


Date

Office of the Chief Information Officer



U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development





File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleAttached for your immediate attention is the electronic copy of the SSN and PII memorandum distributed to Departmental Principle
AuthorNadine Craft
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-30

© 2025 OMB.report | Privacy Policy