30-Day Federal Register Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 10, 2025 / Notices
Carrier Safety Regulations. FMCSA must
publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public an opportunity to inspect the
information relevant to the application,
including the applicant’s safety
analysis. The Agency must provide an
opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews the application,
safety analyses, and public comments
submitted and determines whether
granting the exemption would likely
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be
achieved absent such exemption,
pursuant to the standard set forth in 49
U.S.C. 31315(b)(1). The Agency must
publish its decision in the Federal
Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)). If granted,
the notice will identify the regulatory
provision from which the applicant will
be exempt, the effective period, and all
terms and conditions of the exemption
(49 CFR 381.315(c)(1)). If the exemption
is denied, the notice will explain the
reason for the denial (49 CFR
381.315(c)(2)). The exemption may be
renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).
III. Applicant’s Request
Current Regulatory Requirements
The Agency’s CDL regulations in 49
CFR 383.25(a)(1) require that a CLP
holder always be accompanied by the
holder of a valid CDL for the group (e.g.,
Group A or B) and with any
endorsement(s) necessary to operate the
CMV. The CDL holder must be
physically present in the front seat of
the vehicle next to the CLP holder or,
in the case of a passenger vehicle,
directly behind or in the first row
behind the driver and must have the
CLP holder under observation and
direct supervision.

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

Applicant’s Request
Wilson Logistics seeks a renewal of its
exemption from the provision in 49 CFR
383.25(a)(1), which FMCSA originally
granted on February 23, 2021, and
remains in effect through February 23,
2026 [86 FR 11050]. Wilson Logistics is
a nationwide motor carrier, with its own
pre-apprentice CDL training program. It
is also a registered training provider and
a certified third-party CDL tester in the
State of Missouri. Wilson Logistics
administers the CDL test for prospective
Wilson Logistics driver employees
(called ‘‘pre-apprentices’’) that have
completed its CDL training program.
Since the initial granting of its
exemption in 2021, the applicant has
trained 1,381 prospective driver
employees and successfully tested and

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:38 Dec 09, 2025

Jkt 268001

57275

approved 1,264 or 91.5% of these
individuals. The applicant describes its
program as a company-sponsored,
hands-on, on-the-job, pre-apprentice
CDL training program accessible only to
Wilson Logistics prospective driver
employees. While participating in the
driver training, the pre-apprentices are
not employed by Wilson Logistics. Once
pre-apprentices obtain their CDL, they
receive an offer of employment from
Wilson Logistics.

Wilson Logistics states that it ensures
an equivalent level of safety by verifying
that no applicant will ever operate its
CMVs without passing the State CDL
exam administered by Wilson Logistics
as a third-party tester and by requiring
drivers to keep a copy of their passing
CDL exam score, permit and license in
their possession.
A copy of the Wilson Logistics
application for exemption is available
for review in the docket for this notice.

Applicant’s Equivalent Level of Safety
The applicant believes its safety data
shows that its process works, and that
it has maintained an equivalent level of
safety while operating under the
exemption. During the company’s threeweek training program, CLP holders
learn how to safely operate a CMV,
including basic backing maneuvers, and
are subsequently transitioned to a
minimum of two weeks driving overthe-road while a CDL instructor is
observing and providing feedback from
the passenger seat. The instructor
supervises while instructing all nondriving aspects of the job, including preand post-trip inspections, coupling and
uncoupling, trip planning, and backing.
Wilson Logistics CLP holders deliver
actual loads to real customers on the
Nation’s highways in all types of
conditions and traffic patterns. The
applicant believes that providing handson, highly supervised training at a oneon-one level of instructor to trainee is
the best practice.
As a third-party tester, Wilson
Logistics’s four CDL examiners are
continuously examined by the State of
Missouri throughout the year for
compliance. Wilson Logistics’s testing
policy permits a pre-apprentice to take
the CDL skills test no more than twice.
If a pre-apprentice fails the CDL test the
first time, he or she receives an
additional 3 to 4 days of training, before
attempting to take the CDL skills test
again. If a pre-apprentice fails twice,
then he or she is disqualified from
Wilson’s pre-apprenticeship program.
According to Wilson Logistics, preapprentices have a 95% first-time pass
rate.
Once the pre-apprentice has passed
the test, a Wilson Logistics trainer
accompanies the CLP holder for the first
30,000 miles. For the first 10,000 miles
the trainer is in the front passenger seat
of the CMV; during the remaining
20,000 miles the trainer is in the CMV,
although not necessarily in the front
seat of the vehicle. Trainers also
accompany the CLP holders when they
return to their State of Domicile to
receive their CDL after having passed
the test.

IV. Request for Comments

PO 00000

Frm 00099

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
31315(b), FMCSA requests public
comment from all interested persons on
the Wilson Logistics application for an
exemption from the requirement in 49
CFR 383.25(a)(1), which requires a CLP
holder always be accompanied by the
holder of a valid CDL in the front seat
of the CMV who has the proper CDL
group and endorsement(s) necessary to
operate the vehicle. All comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the
location listed under the Addresses
section of this notice. Comments
received after the comment closing date
will be filed in the public docket and
will be considered to the extent
practicable. In addition to late
comments, FMCSA will also continue to
file, in the public docket, relevant
information that becomes available after
the comment closing date. Interested
persons should continue to examine the
public docket for new material.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2025–22390 Filed 12–9–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2024–0096]

Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Factors That Influence
the Effectiveness of Hazard
Anticipation and Attention
Maintenance Training
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments on a request for approval of
a new information collection.
AGENCY:

E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM

10DEN1

57276

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 10, 2025 / Notices

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (ICR)
summarized below will be submitted to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. The ICR
describes the nature of the information
collection and its expected burden. The
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) proposes to
conduct a new information collection,
Factors that Influence the Effectiveness
of Hazard Anticipation and Attention
Maintenance Training, from 168
participants ages 18 and 19 who do not
yet have driver’s licenses for a research
study on novice driver training. This
information will be used to test the
effectiveness of a hazard anticipation
and attention maintenance training
program for novice drivers that takes
relatively little time to complete and
could support future efforts to deliver
the training via smartphones. A Federal
Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the
following information collection was
published on August 21, 202. NHTSA
did not receive any comments on the
proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before January 9, 2026.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection, including
suggestions for reducing burden, should
be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
To find this particular information
collection, select ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comment’’ or
use the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information or access to
background documents, contact
Christine Watson, Ph.D., Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NPD–320),
Christine.Watson@dot.gov, phone: (771)
241–3120, National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, W46–474, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. Please identify the relevant
collection of information by referring to
its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), a Federal
agency must receive approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) before it collects certain
information from the public and a
person is not required to respond to a
collection of information by a Federal
agency unless the collection displays a
valid OMB control number. In
compliance with these requirements,

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

SUMMARY:

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:38 Dec 09, 2025

Jkt 268001

this notice announces that the following
information collection request will be
submitted OMB.
Title: Factors that Influence the
Effectiveness of Hazard Anticipation
and Attention Maintenance Training.
OMB Control Number: New.
Form Numbers: NHTSA Forms 2018,
2019, 2020, 2021.
Type of Request: Request for approval
of a new information collection.
Type of Review Requested: Regular.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: 3 years from date of approval.
Summary of the Collection of
Information: NHTSA is seeking
approval for a one-time voluntary
information collection from 168
participants ages 18 and 19 who do not
yet have driver’s licenses for a research
study on novice driver training.
Specifically, this collection involves
developing and testing a novice driver
training program on a smartphone-like
platform and determining whether the
effectiveness of the training differs for
participants of different sexes,
socioeconomic status (SES) strata, and
trait levels of sensation seeking and
aggressiveness.
To be eligible for the study,
participants must be 18 or 19 years old,
must not have an unrestricted driver’s
license or an intermediate/provisional
license that allows driving
independently, and must be interested
in obtaining one in the next 12 months.
Recruitment efforts will include posting
information about the study on social
media platforms, providing study
information to contacts in local
communities (e.g., community college
faculty, high school principals, local
driving schools), and reaching out to
those who participated in past studies at
the research center and agreed to be
contacted about future opportunities.
Enrolled participants will complete
either the hazard anticipation and
attention maintenance training program
or a placebo training program on a
smartphone-like platform. Then,
participants’ driving performance will
be assessed on a computerized driving
simulator. Finally, participants will
complete a questionnaire that includes
demographic questions and two
validated scales to assess trait levels of
sensation seeking and aggressiveness.
After data collection, the research team
will examine whether driving simulator
performance differs between
participants who took the hazard
anticipation and attention maintenance
training program and those that received
the placebo training. The research team
will also investigate whether the effects
of training differ by sex, SES, and

PO 00000

Frm 00100

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

propensities for sensation seeking and
aggressiveness.
Prior to conducting the study, the
research team will obtain review and
approval of this data collection from an
Institutional Review Board (IRB) that
meets all Federal requirements in 45
CFR 46, is registered with the Office for
Human Research Protections, and has a
Federal wide Assurance. NHTSA will
use the results of this study to produce
a technical report containing summary
descriptive and inferential statistics.
The technical report will be shared with
State highway safety offices, local
governments, policymakers, researchers,
educators, advocates, and others who
may wish to use the data from this
survey to support their work on novice
and teen driver safety.
Description of the Need for the
Information and Proposed Use of the
Information: Novice teen drivers are
more likely to crash in the first several
months after they obtain licenses than
more experienced drivers. Higher crash
rates are observed for novice drivers
who first obtain their licenses at ages 18
and 19,1 novice drivers who live in zip
codes with higher poverty rates,2 male
novices,3 and novices with greater
propensities for personality factors like
sensation seeking and aggressiveness.4
One reason novices who first obtain
their licenses at age 18 or 19 are at
higher risk of crashing may be because
most States do not apply Graduated
Driver Licensing (GDL) requirements to
novice drivers 18 and older. GDL
programs typically restrict nighttime
driving and the number of teen
passengers that can be in the vehicle
and often include the requirement to
enroll in a driver education program. An
increasing proportion of teens are
waiting until age 18 or older to get their
licenses,5 when they are exempt from
1 Masten, S., Foss, R., & Marshall, S. (2011).
Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes
involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers. Journal of the
American Medical Association, 306(14), 1098–1103.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/
1104325.
2 Roberts, S., Zhang, F., Fisher, D., & Vaca, F.
(2021). The effect of hazard awareness training on
teen drivers of varying socioeconomic status.
Traffic Injury Prevention, 22(6), 455–459. https://
doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1940984.
3 National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
(2024, July). Young drivers: 2022 data (Traffic
Safety Facts. Report No. DOT HS 813 601). National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration. https://
crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/
ViewPublication/813601.
4 Bates, L.J., Davey, J., Watson, B., King, M.J., &
Armstrong, K. (2014). Factors contributing to
crashes among young drivers. Sultan Qaboos
University Medical Journal, 14(3), e297—e305.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC4117653/.
5 Twenge, J., & Park, H. (2019). The decline in
adult activities among U.S. adolescents, 1976–2016.

E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM

10DEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 10, 2025 / Notices

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

most States’ GDL requirements, and part
of this delay may be the cost and
availability associated with traditional
novice driver education programs.6
However, while most research has failed
to find evidence that traditional prelicensure driver education reduces
novice drivers’ crash risk,7 a growing
body of studies suggests that training
that focuses on teaching specific skills—
hazard anticipation and attention
maintenance—may increase novice
drivers’ safety. Prior studies also suggest
that trainings focused on these skills
may especially benefit male novices,8
novice drivers from lower SES
backgrounds,2 and young drivers with
lower levels of the sensation seeking
and aggressiveness personality traits.9
Hazard anticipation training teaches
novices to be aware of hazards on the
road that are visible and those that are
hidden. Novice driver training programs
targeting hazard anticipation have
reduced behaviors linked to crashes on
driving simulators 10 and during on-road
drives 11 and have reduced crashes
among 18-year-old newly-licensed
males by 32% in the year following
training.8 Attention maintenance
training teaches novices to reduce the
number and duration of long glances
away from the forward roadway. Novice
Child Development, 90(2), 638–654. https://doi.org/
10.1111/cdev.12930.
6 Tefft, B. & Foss, R. (2019). Prevalence and
timing of driver licensing among young adults
(Research Brief). AAA Foundation for Traffic
Safety. https://aaafoundation.org/wp-content/
uploads/2019/10/19-0500_AAAFTS_Teen-DriverSafety-Week-Brief_r1.pdf.
7 Kirley, B.B., Robison, K.L., Goodwin, A.H.,
Harmon, K.J. O’Brien, N.P., West, A., Harrell, S.S.,
Thomas, L., & Brookshire, K. (2023, November).
Countermeasures that work: A highway safety
countermeasure guide for State Highway Safety
Offices, 11th edition, 2023 (Report No. DOT HS 813
490). National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/
nhtsa.gov/files/2023-12/countermeasures-thatwork-11th-2023-tag_0.pdf.
8 Thomas, F., Rilea, S., Blomberg, R., Peck, R., &
Korbelak, E. (2016). Evaluation of the safety benefits
of the risk awareness and perception training
program for novice teen drivers (Report No. DOT
HS 812 235). National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/
1986/dot_1986_DS1.pdf.
9 Zhang, T., Hajiseyedjavadi, F., Wang, Y.,
Samuel, S., Qu, X., & Fisher, D. (2018). Training
interventions are only effective on careful drivers,
not careless drivers. Transportation Research Part
F (58), 693–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.trf.2018.07.004.
10 Pollatsek, A., Narayanaan, V., Pradhan, A., &
Fisher, D. (2006). Using eye movements to evaluate
a PC-based risk awareness perception training
program on a driving simulator. Human Factors,
48(3), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1518/
001872006778606787.
11 Pradhan, A., Pollatsek, A., Knodler, M. &
Fisher, D. (2009). Can younger drivers be trained to
scan for information that will reduce their risk in
roadway traffic scenarios that are hard to identify
as hazardous?, Ergonomics, 52, 657–673. https://
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2707454/.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:38 Dec 09, 2025

Jkt 268001

driver training programs focused on
attention maintenance have reduced
behaviors linked to crashes on driving
simulators 12 and in the field,13 and the
benefits of training extended up to four
months.14
The goal of this information collection
is to test the effectiveness of a hazard
anticipation and attention maintenance
training program for novice drivers that
takes relatively little time to complete
and could support future efforts to
deliver the training via smartphones.
Another goal of the information
collection is to determine whether the
effectiveness of the training program
differs for groups of novices who may be
at higher risk, i.e., different sexes, SES
levels, and trait levels of sensation
seeking and aggressiveness. NHTSA will
use the results of this study to produce
a technical report to be shared with
State highway safety offices, local
governments, policymakers, researchers,
educators, advocates, and others who
may wish to use the data from this
survey to support their work on novice
and teen driver safety.
60-Day Notice: A Federal Register
notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting public comments on the
following information collection was
published on August 21, 2025 (90 FR
160). No comments were received
regarding the information collection.
Affected Public: Participants will be
English-speaking adults, aged 18—19,
without a driver’s license.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
Overall, 334 annual respondents will
complete the screening questionnaire,
and 60 of these respondents will
undergo the informed consent process.
Finally, of these 60, 54 annual
respondents will enroll and participate
in the study.
Although the study site has not been
finalized, our descriptions assume that
the study will be conducted in one
potential study site area, Boston,
Massachusetts. The study plans to
12 Divekar, G., Pradhan, A.K., Masserang, K.M.,
Reagan, I., Pollatsek, A., & Fisher, D.L. (2013). A
simulator evaluation of the effects of attention
maintenance training on glance distributions of
younger novice drivers inside and outside the
vehicle. Transportation Research Part F, 20, 154–
169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2013.07.004.
13 Pradhan, A.K., Divekar G., Masserang, K.,
Romoser, M., Zafian, T., Blomberg, R., Thomas, F.,
Reagan, I., Knodler, M., Pollatsek, A., & Fisher, D.
(2011). The effects of focused attention training
(FOCAL) on the duration of novice drivers’ glances
inside the vehicle. Ergonomics (54), 917–931.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/
PMC3437545/.
14 Divekar, G., Samuel, S., Pollatsek, A., Thomas,
D.F., Korbelak, K., Blomberg, R.D., & Fisher, D.L.
(2016). Effects of a PC-based attention maintenance
training program on driver behavior can last up to
four months. Transportation Research Record,
2602(1), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-15.

PO 00000

Frm 00101

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

57277

recruit participants who are ages 18 and
19, who do not have an unrestricted
driver’s license or an intermediate/
provisional license that allows driving
independently, and who are interested
in obtaining an unrestricted or
intermediate/provisional license in the
next 12 months. Participants may have
a learner’s permit. A screening
questionnaire will be administered
electronically to an estimated 1,002
potential participants (334 annually) to
yield a total sample of 168 participants
(56 annually). We estimate that
approximately 18% (180 participants) of
those who respond to the screening
questionnaire will be eligible,
interested, and will travel to the
research center to undergo the informed
consent procedure. Then, an estimated
168 participants (approximately 94% of
those who undergo the informed
consent process) are expected to consent
and enroll in the study. Of the 168
enrolled participants, 84 will be from a
low SES stratum (as determined by
average poverty rate of zip code of
residence at age 17) and 84 will be from
a medium/high SES stratum. An equal
number of males and females will be
recruited within each SES group.
Frequency: This study will be
conducted one time during the threeyear period for which NHTSA is
requesting approval.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: The research team expects to
provide screening questionnaires to an
estimated 1,002 potential participants to
determine their eligibility for the study.
The research team will post the
opportunity on social media platforms
likely to be seen by eligible participants
and provide it to existing contacts (e.g.,
managers at neighborhood development
community centers, teen centers,
community college faculty in the area,
high school principals, local driving
schools) in local communities. The
research team will also contact potential
participants via email or phone who
indicated a prior interest in similar past
studies if they agreed to be contacted
about future opportunities. Completing
the screening questionnaire has an
estimated burden of 5 minutes per
respondent (an annual burden of 28
hours for 334 annual respondents,
averaged over the three-year approval
period) (Table 1).
Similar to a NHTSA behavioral study
recently reviewed by OMB,15 we
estimate that approximately 18% (180
individuals) of those who respond to the
screening questionnaire will be eligible,
interested, and will travel to the
research center to undergo the informed
consent process. Travel time from
around the Boston metropolitan area is

E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM

10DEN1

57278

Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 10, 2025 / Notices

estimated at 60 minutes round trip, and
the informed consent process is
estimated to take 10 minutes. Thus, the
burden for this second phase of the
study, including travel time, is
estimated at 70 minutes per participant
(an annual burden of 70 hours for 60
annual respondents).
Finally, we estimate that
approximately 94% (168 individuals) of
those who undergo the informed
consent process will consent and enroll
in the study. For these participants,
participation in the study is estimated at
240 minutes per participant (an annual
burden of 224 hours for 56 annual
respondents). Study tasks include (see
Table 1):
i. An enrollment process (5 minutes);
ii. A pre-study questionnaire
assessing participants’ propensity to

experience motion sickness in the
computerized driving simulator (5
minutes);
iii. A pre-training hazard anticipation
and attention maintenance test
administered on a smartphone-like
platform (20 minutes);
iv. A novice driver training program
(placebo or treatment), administered on
a smartphone-like platform (60
minutes);
v. A post-training hazard anticipation
and attention maintenance test
administered on a smartphone-like
platform (20 minutes);
vi. A break (15 minutes);
vii. A drive on a computerized driving
simulator (90 minutes); and
viii. A post-study questionnaire (25
minutes) that consists of: demographic
questions; the Arnett Inventory of

Sensation Seeking; 15 the Buss-Perry
Aggression Questionnaire; 16 and a poststudy debriefing.
In total, NHTSA estimates that this
information collection will yield a total
annual burden of 322 hours (Table 1).
NHTSA estimates the opportunity
cost to respondents using an average
hourly wage. The May 2023 mean
hourly wage for all occupations in the
United States was $31.48 per hour.17
Additionally, given that wages in
burden estimates need to be fullyloaded,18 we added 29% to reflect the
full cost of labor, including benefits,
yielding a fully-loaded mean hourly
wage of $40.61. Therefore, NHTSA
estimates the total annual opportunity
cost to be approximately $13,069 (Table
1).

khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES

TABLE 1—ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Information collection

Annual
number of
respondents

Burden per
response
(minutes)

Hourly
opportunity
cost

Opportunity
cost per
response

Total annual
opportunity
cost

Total
annual
burden
(hours)

NHTSA Form 2018 (Total) ...........................................
Screening Questionnaire ......................................
NHTSA Form 2019 (Total) ...........................................
Travel Time (Round-Trip) .....................................
Informed Consent .................................................
NHTSA Form 2020 (Total) ...........................................
Enrollment .............................................................
Pre-Study Questionnaire ......................................
NHTSA Form 2021 (Total) ...........................................
Pre-Training Test ..................................................
Training Program ..................................................
Post-Training Test ................................................
Break .....................................................................
Driving Simulator Testing .....................................
Post-Study Questionnaire .....................................

334
......................
60
......................
......................
56
......................
......................
56
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................

5
....................
70
60
10
10
5
5
230
20
60
20
15
90
25

$40.61
......................
40.61
......................
......................
40.61
......................
......................
40.61
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................

$3.38
......................
47.38
......................
......................
6.77
......................
......................
155.67
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................

$1,129
........................
2,843
........................
........................
379
........................
........................
8,718
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................

28
..............
70
..............
..............
9
..............
..............
215
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............
..............

Total ...............................................................

......................

....................

......................

......................

13,069

322

Estimated Total Annual Burden Cost:
$0.
Participation in this study is
voluntary and there are no costs to
participants beyond the time spent
completing the study. The costs
associated with travel to the research
center are minimal and expected to be
offset by the compensation that will be
provided to the research participants.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspects of this
information collection, including (a)

whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Department’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including the use of

15 Arnett, J. (n.d.) Arnett Inventory Sensation
Seeking (AISS). https://sjdm.org/dmidi/Arnett_
Inventory_of_Sensation_Seeking.html.
16 Buss, A. & Perry, M. (n.d.) Buss Perry
Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). https://

psychology-tools.com/test/buss-perry-aggressionquestionnaire.
17 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024, April 3).
May 2023 National Occupational Employment and
Wage Estimates. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

16:38 Dec 09, 2025

Jkt 268001

PO 00000

Frm 00102

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as
amended; 49 CFR 1.49; and DOT Order
1351.29A.
Jane Terry,
Acting Associate Administrator, Research
and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2025–22429 Filed 12–9–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#000000.
18 https://pra.digital.gov/burden/estimation/.

E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM

10DEN1