Download: 
docx | 
pdf
Strengthening
Mobility And Revolutionizing Transportation (SMART) Grant Program
EXHIBIT
E (PROJECT EVALUATION PHASE): Annual Implementation Report Guidance
for SMART Grant Recipients
	
	
		
			| 
				Annual
				Implementation Reports | 
	
	
		
			| 
				Project
				Overview (All Reports) 
					Describe
					the project and highlight the technologies being deployed (if
					multiple technologies are being deployed, this may be organized
					as “use cases”)Summarize what constitutes
					end-of-project successes | 
		
			| 
				Evaluation
				Goals/Objectives, Evaluation Questions, Performance Measures (All
				Reports) 
					Describe
					project evaluation goals and/or objectives and associated
					evaluation questions (or hypotheses) and performance measures 
					The inclusion of a table that
					demonstrates how these elements map to one another is strongly
					recommended (in addition to explanatory text). 
					 | 
		
			| 
				Elements
				Specific to Stage 1 Reporting 
				 
					Describe
					anticipated costs and benefits of the project, including: 
						data
						on the performance metrics for the proof-of-concept or
						prototype; 
						preliminary
						baseline data for an evaluation of at scale implementation; 
						a
						detailed description of the community that would be impacted by
						at scale implementation and the anticipated distribution of
						benefits; and 
						quantitative
						data to substantiate key assumptions. 
						Demonstrate
					the feasibility of at scale implementation, including identified
					strategies or demonstrated progress in addressing the following
					implementation feasibility and readiness factors by the end of
					the Stage 2 Grant. 
					 
						Legal,
						Policy, and Regulatory Requirements (e.g., environmental
						permits and reviews; public outreach; State and local
						approvals; equity and accessibility requirements) 
						Procurement
						& Budget (e.g., availability of suppliers and
						equipment; Buy America requirements; reliability of cost
						estimates; critical property acquisition) 
						Partnerships
						(e.g., MOUs for stakeholder coordination; private sector and
						user adoption and acceptance) 
						Technology
						Availability (e.g., systems engineering including ConOps
						and Detailed Design; maturity of technology; compatibility with
						existing infrastructure) 
						Data
						Governance (e.g., storage capability; database analytic
						capability; integration requirements; sharing agreements;
						cybersecurity and privacy protocols) 
						Workforce
						Capacity (e.g., availability of workforce from development
						and installation to operations and maintenance; availability of
						workforce training; agency capacity for deployment, operation,
						and evaluation) 
						Sustainability
						(e.g., agency/institutional capacity for continued operations
						following the grant funded period; revenue needs for
						continued operations) 
						Other
						Relevant Factors 
						  
				 | 
		
			| 
				Elements
				Specific to Stage 2 Reporting 
				 
					Describe
					the evaluation method(s) and data sources used to measure the
					outcomes/impacts of the project 
					Describe
					whether the project is on track to meet its original
					expectations 
					Provide
					evaluation-related progress updates (e.g., is the grantee having
					any issues with data collection).Describe project challenges and
					lessons learned, including where resource gaps may exist. | 
		
			| 
				Elements
				Specific to Final Implementation Report: 
				 
					Description
					of evaluation design, methods, data sources, and data collection
					periodFinal
					assessment of the deployment and operational costs of the
					project, as compared to the benefits and savings; 
					Final
					evaluation findings, including the extent to which the grantee
					met original expectations, as projected in the SMART grant
					application, related to their specific goals, such as (for
					example): 
					 
						reducing
						traffic-related fatalities and injuries; 
						reducing
						traffic congestion or improving travel-time reliability; 
						effectiveness
						of providing the public with access to realtime integrated
						traffic, transit, and multimodal transportation information to
						make informed travel decisions; 
						reducing
						barriers or improving access to jobs, education, or various
						essential services; 
						lessons
					learned and recommendations for future deployment strategies to
					optimize transportation efficiency and multimodal system
					performance.  
				 
 | 
	
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 
| File Title | The Supporting Statement | 
| Author | FHWA | 
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 | 
| File Created | 2022-08-25 |