USFS Region 2 – Leave No Trace Assessment Survey
OMB No. 0596-0226
	
USFS Region 2 – Leave No Trace Assessment Survey
Consent script:
Thank you for participating in this survey. It is intended for land managers and key stakeholders who are interested in developing and implementing locally-tailored and modern Leave No Trace programming to address current and emerging outdoor recreation-related impacts (e.g. campfire impacts, wildlife impacts, pollution of water sources, etc.) found on public lands in USDA Forest Service Region 2.
NOTE: For the purposes of this survey, the USDA Forest Service “Region 2” refers to the national forests and grasslands in Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota, Kansas, and Nebraska.
The data will help gain a broader understanding of outdoor recreation-related resource impacts throughout the region, the effectiveness of outdoor user ethics education efforts, and opportunities for engaging visitors. Specifically, this assessment will provide baseline perceptions of recreation resource conditions, perceptions of impacts, and potential solutions. It will also asses and analyze emerging education opportunities throughout the region.
The data from this assessment will not be disseminated to the general public, nor will it be used for the purposes of substantially informing influential policy decisions.
Your participation is voluntary and your responses are confidential. You can stop taking the survey at any time, and there are no risks or benefits for participation. This survey will take approximately 9 minutes to complete.
For information or questions about this survey, please contact Ben Lawhon, Director of Education and Research, Leave No Trace Center for Outdoor Ethics Ben@LNT.org or Chad Schneckenburger, R2 Regional Trails and Dispersed Recreation Program Manager Chad.Schneckenburger@usda.gov
Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0596-0226. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 9 minutes per response, including the time for initial contact, reviewing instructions, and completing this survey.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights,1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
1) Please select what you believe are the five most popular outdoor recreational uses in Region 2
 ATV/OHV use (including jeeps, motorcycles, 4-wheelers, XSX, etc.)
 Backcountry skiing/snowboarding
 Backpacking
 Birding
 Bouldering
 Camping in developed sites (designated campgrounds)
 Cross-country skiing
 Downhill skiing/snowboarding
 Driving for pleasure/sightseeing
 Dispersed camping (not in developed campgrounds)
 Equestrian/stock use
 Flatwater canoeing
 Flatwater kayaking
 Forest bathing
 Freshwater angling
 Gathering food/forest products
 Gathering traditional medicine
 Geocaching
 Hammock use
 Hiking/walking
 Hunting
 Motorized boating
 Mountain biking
 Nature center activities
 Nature photography
 Nature study
 Outdoor games (bocce, frisbee, etc.)
 Picnicking
 Resort use
 Road cycling
 Rock climbing
 Running (road)
 Running (trail)
 RV camping in developed sites (designated campgrounds)
 RV camping with toy hauler(s) in developed sites
 RV dispersed camping (not in developed campgrounds)
 RV dispersed camping with toy hauler(s)
 Shed/antler hunting
 Shooting sports
 Slacklining
 Sledding
 Snowmobiling
 Snowshoeing
 Stand up paddle boarding
 Swimming
 Visiting historic or cultural sites
 Waterskiing
 Wakeboarding
 Whitewater paddling (kayaking, rafting, canoeing)
 Wildlife watching
 Other:
2) Rate your perception of the level of impact of following outdoor recreation-related impacts in Region 2:
| 
			 | No Impact | Slight Impact | Moderate Impact | Extensive Impact | Severe Impact | Unsure | 
| Damage to vegetation | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Trash | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Visitor conflicts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Inappropriate use of technology (GPS, drones, etc.) | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Invasive species | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Improper disposal of human waste | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Public safety issues | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| 
			 | No Impact | Slight Impact | Moderate Impact | Extensive Impact | Severe Impact | Unsure | 
| Pet waste/ management | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Pollution of water sources | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Damage to cultural or historical features | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Campfire impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Impacts to wildlife | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Trail impacts (erosion, cut switchbacks, trail widening, etc.) | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| ATV/OHV impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Jeep/4x4 impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Motorized dirt bikes impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Off trail travel damage | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| 
			 | No Impact | Slight Impact | Moderate Impact | Extensive Impact | Severe Impact | Unsure | 
| Mountain bike impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Stock (horse, mule, llama, etc.) impacts | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Dispersed camping | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Dispersed shooting | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Increased visitation due to social media | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Parking issues at recreation sites | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
4) Does your agency, organization, or business work to address outdoor recreation-related impacts in Region 2?
If YES, question #5 & #6 appear.
If NO, skip to question #7.
DISPLAY LOGIC:
5) How does your agency, organization, or business work to address outdoor recreation-related impacts in Region 2?
| 
			 | Currently in use | Used in the past | Never used | 
| Interpretive programs | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Law enforcement | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Leave No Trace information | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Limiting access | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Permit system | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Printed educational materials | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Provide information via website(s) | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Signage/kiosks | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Staff training | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Issuing citations | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Visitor/traveler education | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Volunteer programs | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Youth education | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Area closures | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| 
			 | Currently in use | Used in the past | Never used | 
| Public outreach | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Provide information via social media | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
| Other (write-in) | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
6) Please rate how effective you think each outreach mechanism is for addressing outdoor recreation-related impacts in Region 2.
| 
			 | Not at all effective | Slightly effective | Moderately effective | Very effective | Extremely effective | Unsure | 
| Interpretive programs | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Law enforcement | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Leave No Trace information | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Limiting access | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Permit system | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Printed educational materials | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| 
			 | Not at all effective | Slightly effective | Moderately effective | Very effective | Extremely effective | Unsure | 
| Provide information via website | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Signage/kiosks | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Staff training | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Issuing citations | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Visitor/traveler education | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Volunteer programs | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Youth education | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Area closures | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Public outreach | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
| Provide information via social media | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
			 | 
			 | 
			 | 
7) To what extent is Leave No Trace information currently utilized to address outdoor recreation-related impacts in Region 2?
 Never used
 Almost never used
 Used occasionally
 Used most of the time
 Used extensively
 I don't know
8) How familiar are you with the typical Region 2 out-of-state visitor (visitors from states outside of the 5 states in Region 2) to Forest Service lands?
 Not at all familiar
 Slightly familiar
 Somewhat familiar
 Moderately familiar
 Extremely familiar
 Other - Write In:
9) How familiar are you with the typical Region 2 in-state visitor (visitors from the five states that make up Region 2) to Forest Service lands?
 Not at all familiar
 Slightly familiar
 Somewhat familiar
 Moderately familiar
 Extremely familiar
 Other - Write In:
10) How would you describe your current knowledge of “Leave No Trace” practices?
No knowledge
Limited
Average
Extensive
Expert
If “Limited” or greater knowledge, questions #11 - 14 appear.
If “No knowledge,” skip to question #15.
DISPLAY LOGIC:
We’re interested in your views on practicing “Leave No Trace.”
11) Sometimes it is too difficult to practice “Leave No Trace.”
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
12) Practicing “Leave No Trace” effectively protects the environment for future generations to enjoy.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
13) It is important that all visitors to/in Region 2 practice “Leave No Trace.”
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
14) It is important that public land regulations require all visitors to practice “Leave No Trace.”
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree or disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
15) What should be the goals for developing a regionally-tailored Leave No Trace program in Region 2? [write-in]
16) Does your agency, organization, or business currently have staff trained in Leave No Trace?
 Yes
 No
 Not sure
 Other - Write In:
If YES, question #17 appears.
If NO, skip to question #18.
DISPLAY LOGIC:
17) What is the level of staff Leave No Trace training? Check all that apply.
 Master Educator
 Trainer
 Awareness
 Not sure
18) How would you envision Leave No Trace information being disseminated to Region 2 visitors/travelers? Check all that apply.
 Social media
 Print media
 Website
 Chambers of Commerce
 Local user groups (e.g. hiking club)
 Local merchants
 Volunteers
 Signage
 Maps
 Guidebooks
 Other printed materials
 Agency staff
 Volunteers
 Non-governmental organization
 Destination marketing organizations
 State Dept. of Transportation digital road signage
 Public Service Announcements (radio, print, etc.)
 Outdoor brands
 Hospitality staff
 Visitor Centers
 Other - Write In:
19) What type of agency, organization or business do you work or volunteer for?
State agency
Federal agency
Non-governmental organization
Municipal government
Business
Tourism entity/provider
Trail organization or club
College or university
Destination marketing organization
Hospitality business
Other - Write In:
20) What state in Region 2 do you work or volunteer in most often?
Colorado
Kansas
Nebraska
South Dakota
Wyoming
21) What are 3-5 current outdoor recreation-related opportunities in Region 2 for improved visitor education/information? [write-in]
Opportunity:
Opportunity:
Opportunity:
Opportunity:
Opportunity:
22) Are their specific outdoor recreation-related impacts on national forests in your state that present an immediate opportunity for visitor education/information?
Yes
No
Not sure
If YES, question #23 appears.
If NO, skip to question #24.
DISPLAY LOGIC:
23) Please list the specific outdoor recreation-related impacts on national forests in your state that present an immediate opportunity for visitor education/information. [write-in]
24) Please list any additional comments or feedback regarding Leave No Trace visitor education efforts in Region 2.
Copyright 2020 Leave No Trace Center for Outdoor Ethics
www.LNT.org | 1.800.332.4100
| File Type | application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document | 
| Author | Ben Lawhon | 
| File Modified | 0000-00-00 | 
| File Created | 2022-04-07 |