Economic Contribution of Federal Investments in Restoration of Degraded, Damaged, or Destroyed Ecosystems.

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Project Manager Survey - State Local Tribal Govt Form	Modified
1028-0107 30-day FRN published 2016-27194.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-11-14
1028-0107 SSA Restore Ecosystems 2016-11-07.docx Supporting Statement A	2016-11-07
Email to Project Managers 2016-11-04.docx Supplementary Document	2016-11-04
OPA_1990.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-09-15
ARRA_2009.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-09-15
CWA.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-09-15
CERCLA_1980.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-09-15
1028-0107 60-day FRN Ecosystems 2016-15657.pdf Supplementary Document	2016-09-15
1028-0107 SSB Restore Ecosystems 2016-08-30.docx Supporting Statement B	2016-09-15

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
206652	Follow Up Contact Other-Follow Up Scripts	Removed
206651	Project Summary Survey: Introductory Call Other-Initial Contact Script	Removed
205956	Project Manager Survey - State Local Tribal Govt Form	Modified
205955	Project Managers Survey - Private Industry Instruction	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1028-0107	ICR Reference No: 201608-1028-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201302-1028-002
Agency/Subagency: DOI/GS	Agency Tracking No: Catherine M Cullinane Thomas
Title: Economic Contribution of Federal Investments in Restoration of Degraded, Damaged, or Destroyed Ecosystems.
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 01/19/2017
	Date Received in OIRA: 11/15/2016
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	01/31/2020	36 Months From Approved	01/31/2017
Responses	6	0	900
Time Burden (Hours)	22	0	358
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The mission of the DOI Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Program (NRDA Restoration Program) is to restore natural resources injured as a result of oil spills or hazardous substance releases into the environment. Researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and the DOI Office of Policy Analysis are conducting this information collection at the request of the NRDA Restoration Program. The NRDA Restoration Program is weighing the pros and cons of collecting restoration cost data as part of contractor reporting requirements for restoration projects associated with Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration (NRDAR) cases. The collection described under this request is designed to refine potential expenditure and project summary questions prior to developing e contractor reporting requirements. This is a continuation of collection OMB-1028-0107 that was initiated in 2013. Case studies and methods developed through this original collection are published in a USGS Open File Report titled “Estimating the Economic Impacts of Ecosystem Restoration—Methods and Case Studies” . USGS and the DOI Office of Policy Analysis are modifying the survey instruments and analysis methodologies based on lessons learned from the original effort. This collection will result in additional case studies that will test modified survey instruments and analysis methods. Expenditure data will be collected and economic impacts will be estimated for approximately 10 DOI restoration projects per year for 3 years.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 42 USC 9601 Name of Law: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
   US Code: 33 USC 2701 Name of Law: Oil Pollution Act
   US Code: 33 USC 1251-1376 Name of Law: Clean Water Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	81 FR 43224	07/01/2016
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	81 FR 79045	11/10/2016
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 2

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Project Managers Survey - Private Industry	na, na	Expenditure survey ,   survey monkey mockup
Project Manager Survey - State Local Tribal Govt	na, na	Expenditure survey ,   survey monkey mock up
Follow Up Contact
Project Summary Survey: Introductory Call

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	6	900	0	0	-894	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	22	358	0	0	-336	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement:

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $21,773

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 11/15/2016

---