RPOS State Team Mtg Survey

Promoting Rigorous Career and Technical Education Programs of Study

Rigorous Programs of Study Project Directors’ Meeting

September 17–18, 2013 | Washington, DC

Post-Meeting Questions

Please evaluate the meeting’s planning, materials, and overall quality by rating the items listed below on a 1–5 scale, where 1=Poor and 5=Excellent.

	Poor	Unsatisfactory	Satisfactory	Very good	Excellent
Meeting Information and Logistics Meeting Announcements/Background Lodging Arrangements Meeting Registration Meeting Materials
Meeting Meeting Format Content

Please rate the usefulness of the following sessions for your RPOS-related work in your state, school, or institution on a 1–5 scale, where 1=Not Useful and 5=Very Useful.

SEPTEMBER 17 SESSIONS	Not Useful	A little bit useful	Somewhat useful	Mostly useful	Very useful
State Project Briefing
Small Group Dialogue Session (please check group) State Agency Personnel Local Secondary/Postsecondary Team Members External Evaluators
RPOS Evaluation and Data Collection
Grant Management
State Team Discussions

SEPTEMBER 18 SESSIONS	Not Useful	A little bit useful	Somewhat useful	Mostly useful	Very useful
Institutionalizing Change
Technical Assistance Resources
State Outreach Efforts
Using Data for Program Improvement
Challenges of Rural Implementation
Open Exchange

OVERALL, the meeting was…

Please mark the category best describing the area you represent as a member of your state team.

_____ Local Secondary Staff _____ Local Postsecondary Staff _____ State Agency Staff

_____ RPOS Project State Evaluator _____ Other

GENERAL COMMENTS

What did you like most about this meeting?

What did you like least about this meeting?

Please share your suggestions for improving future RPOS meetings.