SS part A rev July '07

SS part A rev July '07.doc

Production Estimate, Quarterly Construction Sand and Gravel and Crushed and Broken Stone

OMB: 1028-0065

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions


OMB Control Number 1028-0065

Production Estimate, Quarterly Construction Sand and Gravel and Crushed and Broken Stone (3 forms—see Enclosure)

Expiration Date: April 30, 2007

Terms of Clearance: None


General Instructions


A Supporting Statement, including the text of the notice to the public required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv) and its actual or estimated date of publication in the Federal Register, must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain the information specified in Section A below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. When statistical methods are used, Section B of the Supporting Statement must be completed. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.


Specific Instructions


A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI) has policy responsibility for the Nation’s mineral resources and their derived industries. The National Mining and Minerals Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-631; see Enclosure 2) and the National Materials and Minerals Policy, Research and Development Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-479; see Enclosure 3) make it incumbent upon the Secretary of the Interior to be informed about and to inform the Congress of important developments, including crises, in the minerals industries. The DOI’s responsibilities regarding mineral resources are discharged through a staff of scientists, including geologists, chemists, and physicists; engineers; economists; and mineral commodity specialists. Many of the responsibilities are assigned to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).


Two fundamental activitiesmining and agricultureform the basis of the Nation’s wealth because they furnish all the raw materials and most of the energy that are used in all other industries. Additionally, the mining industry supplies the fertilizers, pesticides, and soil conditioners that significantly enhance the performance of the agricultural sector. For those raw materials not produced domestically, supplies must be imported. This adversely affects the trade balance and, for some materials, puts U.S. industries at risk of supply disruptions because of international political developments. Imports may also compete with domestic production, thus jeopardizing U.S. jobs. Accordingly, the Government requires accurate, timely data on raw materials production and related industries to formulate policies that ensure national security and economic well-being. The USGS canvass forms are the fundamental means by which data on minerals, mining, and related materials production are obtained.



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection. [Be specific. If this collection is a form or a questionnaire, every question needs to be justified.]


Each company reports commodity data consistent with industry standards and as mutually agreed upon by the company and the USGS commodity specialists. Based on their submissions, the USGS routinely supplies information, analyses, and data for decisionmaking purposes to the Congress and various presidential councils and commissions. The National Security Council, in particular, has frequently used USGS data in relation to materials mobilization studies and specific presidential projects, such as sustainability analyses.


Information gathered from these canvasses is used by the Secretary of the DOI in the annual report to the Congress on the state of domestic mining and mineral industries as required by Public Law 96-479. Two of the basic provisions of the Act are “the availability of materials is essential for national security, economic well-being, and industrial production” and the “extraction, production, processing, use, recycling, and disposal of materials are closely linked with natural concerns for energy and the environment.” The data also provide ways of identifying industry trends; making supply and demand analyses on varying time cycles; assembling meaningful findings, such as industry vitality; drawing conclusions; and formulating appropriate recommendations for the Government on such matters as stockpiling, tariffs, research and development, and production incentives. The availability, production, supply, and value of some of the minerals are highly volatile and must be analyzed more often than on an annual basis.


These canvasses cover the entire nonfuel minerals mining industry. The data collected are used to conduct domestic ore resource analyses. The USGS then issues, as promptly as possible, various publications that provide essential information while protecting trade secrets and privileged or proprietary commercial or financial information. These data form a substantial part of the USGS’s Automated Minerals Information System (AMIS).


Furthermore, the Strategic and Critical Materials Stock Piling Act (50 U.S.C. 98 et seq.; see Enclosure 4) requires the Secretary to collect data on strategic and critical materials to assist in determining stockpile goals. The Secretary assigned this responsibility for data collection to the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) and transferred the responsibility to the USGS after the USBM was abolished.

The USGS quarterly telephone canvass on domestic production of construction sand and gravel and crushed and broken stone has become a significant indicator of construction activity at the national, as well as the State, level. Recognizing its significance, in January 1997, the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) announced that it will use the USGS quarterly Mineral Industry Surveys as the basis to derive improved monthly indices of Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization, specifically in the Manufacturing and Mining, Stone and Earth Minerals, Crushed Stone, and Sand and Gravel Industry Groups.


The U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) uses USGS data in studies of minerals mobilization, to recommend trade policy and to resolve trade disputes under the International Trade Administration, to assist in export development, to develop materials research, and to develop worldwide mineral production and trade data.


The U.S. Department of State (DOS) uses USGS data to support international commodity negotiations, to analyze relations with foreign mineral producers, and to recommend tariffs and quotas and as a worldwide mineral database.


The U.S. Agency for International Development uses USGS data to assist in determining which minerals are of interest to the United States for development in developing nations.


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) use USGS data in studies of antitrust activities, dumping, and false advertising or misrepresentation of mineral goods or commodities.


The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) uses USGS data to determine research on materials and minerals within research laboratories of the Army, Navy, and the Air Force; sea lanes that must be protected; Defense Production Act Title III projects; National Defense Stockpile (NDS) goals and specifications; details of procurement, storage, and disposal; and suppliers of mineral commodities.


The National Science Foundation, the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the National Research Council use USGS data to ensure maximum benefits from all mineral research.


The U.S. Department of Transportation, the Interstate Commerce Commission, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers use USGS data to determine national and State transportation requirements for the minerals industry.


In addition to the use of USGS data by the majority of Federal Government departments, reports and information are in demand by many types of organizations, including the following:


  • Participating companies

  • Electric utilities

  • Export associations

  • State governments

  • Industrial marketing groups

  • Financial institutions

  • International industry associations

  • Domestic trade associations

  • Industrial and agricultural sectors

  • The general public, especially academic, consulting, and legal organizations.


Certain commodities are canvassed quarterly to furnish information and data for reports and indexes that are prepared more frequently than on a yearly basis.


The methods available for reporting the production data collected by these USGS canvasses vary from commodity to commodity. The production estimate data (quantity and value) can be reported on paper form and over the Web on USGS Forms 9‑4042-A and 9-4124-A. The quarterly construction sand and gravel and crushed and broken stone data (amount per operation) can be reported via telephone and over the Web on Form 9-4142-Q.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden [and specifically how this collection meets GPEA requirements.].


On-line electronic forms are currently available to authenticated users asked to respond who provide a valid user id and password. In addition to producing electronic versions of paper forms, the conversion process encompassed mappings of thousands of fields to the mainframe AMIS database. Cross-checks on data were automated, replacing manual processes. The electronic forms conversion effort exceeds the Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) requirements by establishing intelligent links between the input on the electronic forms and the database rather than simply transforming physical forms to electronic versions of the same.


All respondents who receive a Production Estimate canvass also receive at least one other base canvass. An AMIS algorithm determines which base canvass qualifies respondents to receive a Production Estimate form. The batch process associated with this algorithm automatically registers for one of the two Production Estimate forms such respondents who currently respond via e-forms for the qualifying base canvass. The same batch process issues an e-mailed reminder notice to these respondents.


All respondents for the Quarterly Construction Sand and Gravel and Crushed and Broken Stone canvass are notified of the e-forms option at the time that their data are collected over the phone.


Paper-based forms will remain an option for submission of responses because not all industry respondents are able to or wish to transmit their data to the USGS by electronic means. 30% of the universe is expected to respond electronically.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


If data are available from other Federal or State agencies, trade associations, or other public sources, then USGS canvasses are not conducted. The USGS continuously reviews data collection practices with other agencies, including the DOC and the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), and the ITC, as well as with industry associations such as the Gypsum Association. Where data are available from other sources, these data are used. Alternate data sources are not available for the commodities that are canvassed.




5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


These canvass forms are designed to minimize the burden to all respondents. Enclosure 1 shows estimated respondent and response counts and percentages for small businesses or other small entities, business or other for-profit institutions, Federal government, and State, local or tribal government. The mix of small and large businesses is determined by selecting a cross-section of respondents.



Because only essential data are requested and in a format common to the reporting industry, the burden is kept to the minimum for large and small businesses. When applicable, small businesses often respond with fewer data entries than the larger organizations.



6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


The USGS provides information necessary for sound Federal, State, and industry decisionmaking. If data are not made available as soon as possible after collection or if canvasses are conducted less frequently, then monitoring of stockpile materials for national defense would be impeded by the gap in statistics. The level of domestic and foreign productivity and economic fluctuation would be much less apparent or missed, and that data simply would not be timely enough to be reliable for decisions that affect minerals vulnerability, potential environmental impacts, current trends, and future needs. These decisions, in turn, have an effect on such things as taxes, royalty payments, tariffs, land use, environmental regulations, water use, and transportation.



Collection of quarterly and annual data allows economic analysis that can capture variations—a longer time interval could not. Collection of these data on a biennial basis would not be practical because the industry respondents do not normally have the data in convenient format except on a quarterly or annual basis. A 2-year canvass, for example, would require the respondents to alter their spreadsheets or manually add 2 years of data. This would increase their reporting burden. Also, multiyear data are less meaningful and less convenient for analysis by industry and Government agencies.



Sectors of the public that use the data collected by the USGS include, but are not limited to, the concrete, construction, metals, ceramics, refractories, electric utilities, electronic engineering, chemical, coal, paper, rubber, plastics and agricultural industries. The USGS customer base (recipients of these data) is well over 35,000 and increases considerably each year.



The DOC, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the DOD, the DOS, the World Bank, the FRB, the ITC, the FTC, the Federal Highway Administration, and most of our sister agencies within the DOI are only some of the agencies that rely on these data. The data collected are used to determine the economic health of the Nation, factored into the gross domestic product, and used in forecasts and trends in the building and construction industries, which are closely linked to the issue of rebuilding the infrastructure of the country.



Our customers include banks, brokerage houses, other financial institutions, mineral management companies, independent consultants, and many others who need this information to be able to make informed business decisions. This information is not available from any other source.



7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

* requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

* requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

* requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

* in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

* requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

* that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

* requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secret, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


The data collected by the quarterly canvasses are necessary if the USGS is to meet information demands of Federal agencies that prepare quarterly indices and commodity reports. Additionally, the data are necessary if the USGS is to meet the requirements of Public Law 91-631 for the minerals that have erratic supply, demand, value, availability, or seasonal production patterns.


Under the terms of the disclosure agreement, companies can and usually do specify that the data they supply be shared only in aggregated form. These terms ensure that the USGS will continue to receive proprietary data in confidence.


The canvass forms are designed to ensure that respondents are not required to maintain or provide data in a format other than that in which the data are customarily maintained. The respondents are routinely asked to comment on the design of the forms and to make recommendations that help maintain consistency with industry’s methods of accounting.



8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice [and in response to the PRA statement associated with the collection over the past three years] and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported. [Please list the names, titles, addresses, and phone numbers of persons contacted.]


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years — even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


A copy of the notice that was published in the Federal Register, vol. 71, no. 236, p. 71186, December 8, 2006 (see Enclosure 5), is attached. No public comments were received in response to the notice.



Mineral commodity specialists contact and are routinely contacted by Federal and State agencies, members of Congress, trade associations, the financial community, private companies, universities, and private citizens that request general and specific data and information.



Typically, persons outside the USGS submit and USGS mineral commodity specialists and statistical assistants respond in a timely manner to several thousand e-mail and telephone inquiries each month. By such discussions and interactions, views are exchanged on the availability of data, frequency of collection, clarity of instructions and recordkeeping, disclosure, reporting format, data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported, burden estimates and other aspects of this Information Collection. Although no significant changes to the collection instruments were made, these views help the USGS to continuously improve its data and publications.



Examples of industry contacts between 2004 and 2007 that show responsiveness to customers’ suggestions about the canvasses, and identification of persons who were consulted on the burden estimates and other aspects of this Information Collection include the following:



  1. 9-4142-Q—Quarterly—Construction Sand and Gravel and Crushed and Broken Stone



SummaryThe USGS has offered on-line forms to crushed stone and construction sand and gravel (aggregates) companies as a means of lessening the response burden. Less than 10% of aggregates companies prefer on-line forms to other means of response. Many of the larger companies send in consolidated State data by telephone, fax, or e-mail. From the quarterly data, the USGS estimates the total for the year and the distribution of production among operations within States. Several companies (see below) send spreadsheets instead of USGS forms. The USGS then inputs the data from the spreadsheets into USGS forms for entry into the AMIS.

Conveniences to respondents:

  • Submit production data on consolidated spreadsheet

  • No changes to USGS forms or AMIS

  • Significant time savings (hours or days)



Contact:

Vulcan Materials Company

Chief Economist—Thomas I. Nelson

Phone: 205-298-2123

1200 Urban Center Drive Post Office Box 385014 Birmingham, AL 35242-5014

Date of contact: January 2007



Contact:

Oldcastle Materials, Inc.

Financial Analyst—Marivic Lim-Pingol

Phone: 202-295-3163

1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20007

Date of contact: February 2007



Contact:

Martin Marietta

Billing Supervisor—Shawna Hill

Phone: 919-783-4568

2710 Wycliff Road Raleigh, NC 27607

Date of contact: February 2007



Contact:

Hanson Building Materials America, Inc.

Manager, Financial Analysis—Eric Cooley

Phone: 972-812-1707

8505 Freeport Parkway Suite 600 Irving, TX 75063

Date of Contact: February 2007





B. 9-4042-A—Annual—Production Estimate (one commodity)



Contact:

Searles Valley Minerals

Staff Geologist—Dipti Barari

Phone: 760-372-2568

Post Office Box 367 Trona, CA 93562

Date of contact: September 2006





C. 9-4124-A—Annual—Production Estimate (more than one commodity)



Contact:

American Tals

President—Jim Herickhoff

Phone: 970-482-1163

139 West 2nd Street, Suite 200 Casper, WY 82601

Date of contact: August 2006



Contact:

Millennium, Inc.

Business Manager—J. Blue Sheppard

Phone: 760-742-1356

Post Office Box 382 Pala, CA 92059

Date of contact: 2006



On the basis of such feedback, information-use patterns are established by commodity. Once patterns are determined, canvass forms are revised to collect data and to meet the information needs. As information request patterns change, the data collected and reported are modified.




9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No payments or gifts are made to respondents.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


Public Law 96-479, Section 5(3) (f), ensures the confidentiality of all data reported by persons or firms engaged in any phase of mineral or mineral-material production or large-scale consumption. The disclosure of data shall be in aggregated form so as not to reveal data from a single person or firm.



To implement Section 5(3) (f), the USGS withholds all data reported as “Company Proprietary Data,” and data are disclosed only in the aggregate. Additionally, tests are performed on aggregated data to ensure confidentiality. The USBM standard, which is contained in “Handling Proprietary Survey Data” which was adopted by the USGS, states that absent specific company permission, aggregated data can be reported only if it represents three or more companies and if no one company accounts for more than 75% of the total or if no two companies account for more than 90% of the total. Proprietary data may only be disclosed to Congress or to Federal defense agencies upon official request for appropriate purposes and in some instances to a State government under a cooperative agreement. A disclosure statement and query are printed on each canvass form.



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


Sensitive data are not sought.





12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


* Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.

* If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens.

* Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.


Variations can be expected in the reporting burden for completion of these forms because of the differences in operation size and accounting systems. The data sought are those routinely maintained in the course of business. For some companies with more than one plant, the submission takes the form of a consolidated report covering all company operations. This greatly reduces the reporting burden.



Public reporting burden for this collection of information includes the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Approximately 2,001 respondents report production details of their mining operations annually. For the 2,802 associated responses, completion time averages 10 minutes to 15 minutes per form. Requested are 612 total annual hours burden for reporting and recordkeeping. See the table below and Enclosure 1.



The annualized cost to respondents for the hour burden for this collection of information is estimated to be $18,360 on the basis of an average labor cost of $30 per hour and 612 total annual hours requested. Hourly cost was estimated by averaging typical compensation rates for the variety of positions that respondents hold who complete these canvasses.



Annual Hour Burden Breakdown

Form

Hour Burden

Average No. of Annual Responses

Annual Burden Hours

9-4042-A

15 minutes

822

206

9-4124-A

15 minutes

912

228

9-4142-Q

10 minutes

1,068

178

Total Reporting

2,802

612



13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [non-hour] cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).


* The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.

* If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.

* Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


This supporting statement covers voluntary canvass forms pertaining to a set of industries that are widely diverse in size and mode of operation. The cost and time required to make a detailed canvass-by-canvass estimate for this section would be very high, and, in light of the following factors, would not be worthwhile. We have not identified any non-hour cost burdens.



  1. These are long-established canvasses. Because the requested data are normally maintained in the course of routine operations, no respondents are believed to have purchased equipment or services specifically to answer these canvasses.



  1. The data requested are of the sort kept by companies for their own purposes; the USGS does not ask for data that would not normally be at hand. Providing selected data to the USGS is incidental to business operations.



  1. Only the largest companies might need to purchase office equipment or hire services specifically for the purpose of answering Federal Government questionnaires. In those cases, the demand for data records needed by the USGS would be dwarfed by the volume of records needed by other Government agencies; for example, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Internal Revenue Service, and the DOL.



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


Annualized cost to the Federal Government is estimated at $38,636 based on costs for the following expenses which include actual salaries, benefits, and overhead of Federal employees:



  • Printing of canvass forms

  • Mailing lists compilation and maintenance

  • Mailing operation

  • Editing, coding, tabulation

  • ADP processing

  • Electronic publication of results



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments.


The USGS requests 612 burden hours for this information collection. This represents a net decrease of 95 burden hours from the 707 burden hours in the current inventory for the Production Estimate, Quarterly Construction Sand and Gravel and Crushed and Broken Stone information collection. Because the number of responses decreased, these 95 burden hours appear under the “Adjustment” category. There is no cost burden reported for this collection.



16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


The AMIS mainframe program and off-the-shelf software packages are used to compile and tabulate the data and to prepare tables for publication.



National, State, and regional tabulations are prepared and published annually in table format from data collected by these canvasses. Preliminary estimates are prepared and published in the Mineral Commodity Summaries, which is the earliest Government publication to furnish estimates covering the previous year’s nonfuel mineral industry. Data are also published in the monthly and annual issues of the Mineral Industry Surveys series and the Annual Reports from the Minerals Yearbook and other USGS publications.



Tables present various aspects of commodities, such as consumption and production of products together with industry stocks. Economic changes are incorporated and industry trends and activities are studied. Statistical data are processed and analyzed by the Data Collection and Coordination Section, which also establishes timing for all key steps in the work.



Tabulation and publication of data are governed by the USGS standard for “Handling Proprietary Survey Data.” Data are available via the Internet and in print for select publications in the USGS minerals information series.



Monthly, quarterly, and semiannual tables are generally published within 50 workdays from the end of the reporting month. Annual data are generally published within 9 months from the end of the reporting year. This publication schedule maintains a very high percentage of responses.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


Not applicable.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions".


Not applicable.


15


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
AuthorSteven Stoller
Last Modified Byesformes_p
File Modified2007-07-09
File Created2007-07-09

© 2025 OMB.report | Privacy Policy